Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities

Melissa Jackson, Rodney A. Stewart, Kelly S. Fielding, Jessie Cochrane and Cara D. Beal
Additional contact information
Melissa Jackson: School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, QLD, Australia
Rodney A. Stewart: School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, QLD, Australia
Kelly S. Fielding: School of Communication and Arts, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4067, QLD, Australia
Jessie Cochrane: Water Corporation, Perth 6007, WA, Australia
Cara D. Beal: Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, QLD, Australia

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 2, 1-30

Abstract: Indigenous peoples living in remote areas are often reliant on Governments for essential services and local economic development opportunities. Collaboration and partnership in resource planning and management is espoused as an approach that can provide multiple benefits for all stakeholders including more robust and long-lasting decisions, relationship-building and trust between government and community members as well as capacity building and empowerment of citizens. In Australia however, little evidence from the remote Indigenous community context is available to inform successful collaborations. This paper presents novel research using thematic analysis of practitioner interviews and document review to analyse the current situation of service-provider- remote community engagement and collaboration for sustainable water and energy management. An adapted typology of Indigenous engagement is applied as an analytical framework, categorising water and energy management initiatives according to four key types, each with varying levels of collaboration and implications for sustainable water and energy. Application of the typology shows that technocratic approaches to community engagement continue to dominate this space as collaborative processes are constrained by a range of institutional, governance, technical and cultural factors. The findings have implications for research, policy and practice, and point to a need for a systemic approach to address barriers and facilitate genuine collaboration.

Keywords: collaboration; indigenous; sustainable water; sustainable energy; community development; systemic (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/427/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/427/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:427-:d:197900

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().