Harnessing Insights from Social-Ecological Systems Research for Monitoring Sustainable Development

Odirilwe Selomane, Belinda Reyers, Reinette Biggs and Maike Hamann
Additional contact information
Odirilwe Selomane: Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
Belinda Reyers: Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
Reinette Biggs: Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
Maike Hamann: Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 4, 1-36

Abstract: The United Nations’ Agenda 2030 marks significant progress towards sustainable development by making explicit the intention to integrate previously separate social, economic and environmental agendas. Despite this intention, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which were adopted to implement the agenda, are fragmented in their formulation and largely sectoral. We contend that while the design of the SDG monitoring is based on a systems approach, it still misses most of the dynamics and complexity relevant to sustainability outcomes. We propose that insights from the study of social-ecological systems offer a more integrated approach to the implementation of Agenda 2030, particularly the monitoring of progress towards sustainable development outcomes. Using five key features highlighted by the study of social-ecological systems (SESs) relevant to sustainable development: (1) social-ecological feedbacks, (2) resilience, (3) heterogeneity, (4) nonlinearity, and (5) cross-scale dynamics. We analyze the current set of SDG indicators based on these features to explore current progress in making them operational. Our analysis finds that 59% of the indicators account for heterogeneity, 33% for cross-scale dynamics, 23% for nonlinearities, and 18% and 17%, respectively, for social-ecological feedbacks and resilience. Our findings suggest limited use of complex SES science in the current design of SDG monitoring, but combining our findings with recent studies of methods to operationalize SES features suggests future directions for sustainable development monitoring for the current as well as post 2030 set of indicators.

Keywords: human wellbeing; sustainability; equity; complex adaptive systems; indicators (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1190/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1190/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1190-:d:208606

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().