Effectiveness of Arguments Used in the Creation of Protected Areas of Sustainable Use in Brazil: A Case Study from the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado

Mariane Paulina Batalha Roque, José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto, André Luis Lopes de Faria, Fernanda Machado Ferreira, Thais Helena Teixeira and Lívia Lopes Coelho
Additional contact information
Mariane Paulina Batalha Roque: Department of Rural Economy, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa MG 36570-900, Brazil
José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto: Department of Rural Economy, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa MG 36570-900, Brazil
André Luis Lopes de Faria: Department of Geography, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa MG 36570-900, Brazil
Fernanda Machado Ferreira: Department of Rural Economy, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa MG 36570-900, Brazil
Thais Helena Teixeira: Department of Rural Economy, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa MG 36570-900, Brazil
Lívia Lopes Coelho: Independent Researcher, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 6, 1-16

Abstract: Studies on the effectiveness of the discourse motivating the creation of protected areas (PAs) and their empirical reality are scarce. The lack of knowledge in this area affects programs and policies on the maintenance and creation of protected areas. Thus, we investigated this matter using the case study of the Nascente Geraizeiras Sustainable Development Reserve (NGSDR) in Minas Gerais State, Brazil. The reserve comprises a transition area between Cerrado and the Atlantic Forest, two critical biomes in the world of biodiversity and the only two hotspots in Brazil. Changes in land use were identified over a period of 30 years, from 1987 to 2017, based on a compilation of the arguments associated with the creation of the PA, geographic information system (GIS) techniques, remote sensing (RS) data, and landscape ecology indices. Seven types of land use were identified using Random Forest classifier R software: native forest, silviculture, pasture, bare soil, rocky outcrop, watercourses, and agriculture. The overall mean accuracy of the classification was 90% for all five periods. The results demonstrated that the creation of protected areas is supported by contexts of land use still based on traditional. The case study showed the discourse served as a fundamental strategy in the beginning of the mobilization that culminated in the creation of the NGSDR, in the containment of forestry, in an increase in native forest areas, and in reduced fragmentation, leading to an improvement in the conservation status of the landscape. The present study encourages future researchers to apply the evaluated approach and demonstrates its potential in assessing the formulation of programs and policies on protected areas worldwide, providing valid indicators for the improvement of ecosystem services.

Keywords: hotspots; reserve of sustainable use; socioenvironmental discourse; sustainable use; sustainable development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1700/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1700/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1700-:d:215840

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().