Corporate Social Responsibility and Firms’ Financial Performance: A New Insight

Faisal Mahmood, Faisal Qadeer, Usman Sattar, Antonio Ariza-Montes, Maria Saleem and Jaffar Aman
Additional contact information
Faisal Mahmood: Lahore Business School, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
Faisal Qadeer: Lahore Business School, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
Usman Sattar: Department of Social Work, College of Law and Political Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
Antonio Ariza-Montes: Management Department, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
Maria Saleem: Lahore Business School, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
Jaffar Aman: Postdoctoral Station of Public Administration and Sociology, Hohai University, Nanjing 210000, China

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 10, 1-19

Abstract: A vast stream of literature has investigated the effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firms’ financial performance (FFP). However, this effect has remained unclear and undecided. For instance, numerous studies have examined the direct impact of firms’ CSR initiatives on FFP, as well as examining various mechanisms to explain this relationship, but found inconsistent results. The indecisive results indicate that researchers lack consensus to define a mechanism to understand how and under what conditions CSR can affect FFP. Thus, this research aims to investigate how firms’ CSR perception and disclosure derive accounting- (return on equity: ROE, earnings per share: EPS), market- (Tobin Q) and perception-based firms’ financial performance through the mediation of competitive advantage and boundary conditions of family ownership and CEO narcissism. This research underpins the theoretical lens of the resource-based view to derive hypotheses. The research design employed in this study is quantitative, and the approach to theory development is deductive. Multi-method and multi-source data with temporal breaks are collected from 60 manufacturing firms listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSE). Primary data are collected from the top and middle managers, while secondary data are collected from the annual reports published by these firms. This research found that competitive advantage significantly mediated the indirect impact of perceived CSR and disclosure on FFP. Further, this relationship is strengthened by the contingencies of family ownership and CEO narcissism. Our results will assist the management of the firms to understand the implications of CSR perceptions and disclosure to derive a competitive advantage that ultimately translates into the firms’ financial performance. Further, this research also revealed that managers should concentrate on the boundary conditions of family ownership and CEO narcissism as well. In particular, this research contributes to understand why CSR is viewed to have a strategic importance for the firms and how a resource-based perspective might be utilized in such endeavors.

Keywords: CSR perception and disclosure; financial performance; competitive advantage; family ownership; CEO narcissism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4211/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4211/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4211-:d:361074

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().