Impact of Future Design on Workshop Participants’ Time Preferences

Naoko Nishimura, Nobuhiro Inoue, Hiroaki Masuhara and Tadahiko Musha
Additional contact information
Naoko Nishimura: Department of Gastronomy Management, Ritsumeikan University, Biwako-Kusatsu Campus (BKC), Shiga 525-8577, Japan
Nobuhiro Inoue: Faculty of Economics and Law, Shinshu University, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
Hiroaki Masuhara: Faculty of Economics and Law, Shinshu University, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
Tadahiko Musha: Faculty of Economics and Law, Shinshu University, Nagano 390-8621, Japan

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 18, 1-25

Abstract: In this paper, we examine the impact of Future Design (FD) on public workshops organized in Matsumoto city, Japan, for its city hall renovation plan. We ran an FD workshop and an ordinary workshop as a control, and the participants were randomly assigned to one of the two workshops. We identified the SVO (social value orientation) type (pro-social, pro-self, and other) and elicited time preference of each participant using simple questionnaires that were independent of the context of the workshops. We found that pro-self individuals tend to have shorter time perspectives than pro-social individuals before the workshops. While the pro-self individuals who went through the ordinary workshop became even more myopic, we did not detect such adverse effects in the FD workshop. This contrast between the ordinary and FD workshops is consistent with the qualitative differences in the policy outcomes between the two workshops. The discussions in the ordinary workshop tended to focus on the resolution of today’s needs, such as acquiring more rooms and more services, etc., while the discussions in the FD workshop focused on the more fundamental functions of the city hall that will be needed in the future, thereby leading to more constructive policy proposals. Such demand-based discussions in the ordinary workshop may have been a result of the growing myopia within the pro-self participants, who insisted on ensuring their current needs.

Keywords: future design; public participation; time preferences; social value orientation; experiments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7796/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7796/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7796-:d:416808

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().