Bridging the Literature Gap: A Framework for Assessing Actor Participation in Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS)
Sonja Kaufmann,
Nikolaus Hruschka and
Christian R. Vogl
Additional contact information
Sonja Kaufmann: Division of Organic Farming, Working Group Knowledge Systems and Innovation, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Gregor-Mendel-Str. 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
Nikolaus Hruschka: Division of Organic Farming, Working Group Knowledge Systems and Innovation, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Gregor-Mendel-Str. 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
Christian R. Vogl: Division of Organic Farming, Working Group Knowledge Systems and Innovation, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Gregor-Mendel-Str. 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 19, 1-26
Abstract:
Participatory guarantee systems (PGS) have become increasingly important for organic quality assurance. PGS are promoted as more suitable than third-party certification (TPC) for smallholder farmers in the Global South. The advocated benefits of PGS include the promotion of organic agriculture, farmer empowerment, and the facilitation of food system sustainability. To deliver these benefits, local actor participation is key. To date, there is still an absence of in-depth studies on participation in PGS in the literature. The aim of this study was to contribute to closing this research gap by (i) conducting a meta-analysis on PGS participation and (ii) presenting a framework for studying actor participation in PGS. A systematic literature review on participation in PGS was carried out, using a framework based on Cohen and Uphoff (1980). The results showed that data on participation in PGS are still fragmented in scientific literature. Quantitative empirical evidence and data on the extent and purpose of participation and actors’ perception of participation, for example, are very scarce or not available at all. This paper argues that a systematic and theory-based approach to further research on participation in PGS is needed for improved understanding and facilitation, and suggests an adapted version of Cohen and Uphoff’s (1980) framework for conducting this research.
Keywords: participatory guarantee systems; PGS; participation; organic certification; framework; organic agriculture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8100/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8100/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8100-:d:422421
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().