EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Influences of Livelihood and Land Use on the Variation of Forest Transition in a Typical Mountainous Area of China

Longhui Lu, An Huang, Yueqing Xu, Raymundo Marcos-Martinez, Yaming Duan and Zhengxin Ji
Additional contact information
Longhui Lu: College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
An Huang: College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Yueqing Xu: College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Raymundo Marcos-Martinez: Land and Water, CSIRO, Black Mountain ACT 2601, Australia
Yaming Duan: College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Zhengxin Ji: College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 22, 1-23

Abstract: As one of the countries which has been experiencing a forest transition, China provides important insights into and theoretical and empirical knowledge of forest transition. In this study, through the framework of Sustainable Livelihood Analysis (SLA) and questionnaire surveys, we examined forest transition, farmers’ land-use activities and livelihood changes in Chicheng county, a typical mountainous area in Northern China, during 1975–2018. Most villages of Chicheng county experienced forest transition during the period of 2003–2005, but some villages experienced forest transition in 2010–2015. Forest transition variation over time was influenced by land use and livelihood changes. Livelihood resources, policy and institutional constraints and livelihood strategies had significant influences on land use and then caused variation in forest transition characteristics. The process of “livelihood–land use–forest transition” was the key to achieving and maintaining forest transition, and the interaction between livelihood and land use was a negative feedback relationship between society and ecology. The dominant path of forest transition in Chicheng county was the “economic development path”. Moreover, the “intensive agriculture path of small-scale farmers” enhanced the “economic development path”, and the “forest scarcity path” promoted both of the above two paths. This implies that the feedback and interactions between society and ecology should be taken into account so as to achieve a sustainable human and environmental system.

Keywords: forest transition; land use; livelihood pattern; sustainable livelihood analysis; negative feedback (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9359/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9359/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9359-:d:443222

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9359-:d:443222