Sustainability Assessment and Benchmarking in Higher Education Institutions—A Critical Reflection

Sandra Caeiro, Leyla Angélica Sandoval Hamón, Rute Martins and Cecilia Elizabeth Bayas Aldaz
Additional contact information
Sandra Caeiro: Department of Science and Technology, Universidade Aberta, 1269-001 Lisbon, Portugal
Leyla Angélica Sandoval Hamón: Department of Business Organization, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Rute Martins: Department of Science and Technology, Universidade Aberta, 1269-001 Lisbon, Portugal
Cecilia Elizabeth Bayas Aldaz: Department of Business Organization, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 2, 1-30

Abstract: Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in implementing practices for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). This implementation should be done in different dimensions according to a holistic and whole-school approach. Different tools have been adapted and developed to assess this integrated approach. The aim of this research is to critically reflect the existing tools to assess and benchmark ESD implementation and to discuss their applicability in two case studies. Two public Universities in Southern Europe, with headquarters in the capitals of Portugal and Spain were selected to assess and compare the integration of ESD according to a whole-school approach—Universidade Aberta in Portugal and Universidad Autónoma de Madrid in Spain. After a critical analysis of the existing tools based on literature review and a list of criteria classified by experts, two tools were selected to be applied in the case studies. The online Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System Reporting Tool was used in Universidade Aberta and Green Metrics tool was used in Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. The tools were complemented with focus group with key-actors in both universities. The results obtained allowed to identify the need to define a common objective of the assessment tools and limitations they still have. The tools need improvements on their development namely to integrate the external impact of Higher Education Institutions on sustainability, to integrate participatory processes and to assess non-traditional aspects of sustainability. This research hopes to contribute to the continuous research about the usefulness of these assessment and benchmarking tools as drivers to HEIs improve their sustainability performance and their role as agents of changes.

Keywords: higher education institutions; sustainability benchmarking; sustainability tracking; assessment and rating systemTM; green metrics; education for sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/543/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/543/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:543-:d:307526

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().