Strategic Grazing in Beef-Pastures for Improved Soil Health and Reduced Runoff-Nitrate-A Step towards Sustainability

Subash Dahal, Dorcas Franklin, Anish Subedi, Miguel Cabrera, Dennis Hancock, Kishan Mahmud, Laura Ney, Cheolwoo Park and Deepak Mishra
Additional contact information
Subash Dahal: Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30605, USA
Dorcas Franklin: Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30605, USA
Anish Subedi: Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30605, USA
Miguel Cabrera: Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30605, USA
Dennis Hancock: Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30605, USA
Kishan Mahmud: Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30605, USA
Laura Ney: Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30605, USA
Cheolwoo Park: Department of Statistics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30605, USA
Deepak Mishra: Department if Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30605, USA

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 2, 1-15

Abstract: Generally, improvement in the soil health of pasturelands can result in amplified ecosystem services which can help improve the overall sustainability of the system. The extent to which specific best management practices have this effect has yet to be established. A farm-scale study was conducted in eight beef-pastures in the Southern Piedmont of Georgia, from 2015 to 2018, to assess the effect of strategic-grazing (STR) and continuous-grazing hay distribution (CHD) on soil health indicators and runoff nitrate losses. In 2016, four pastures were converted to the STR system and four were grazed using the CHD system. Post-treatment, in 2018, the STR system had significantly greater POXC (by 87.1, 63.4, and 55.6 mg ha −1 at 0–5, 5–10, and 10–20 cm, respectively) as compared to CHD system. Soil respiration was also greater in the STR system (by 235 mg CO 2 m -2 24 h −1 ) and less nitrate was lost in the runoff (by 0.21 kg ha −1 ) as compared to the CHD system. Cattle exclusion and overseeding vulnerable areas of pastures in STR pastures facilitated nitrogen mineralization and uptake. Our results showed that the STR grazing system could improve the sustainability of grazing systems by storing more labile carbon, efficiently mineralizing soil nitrogen, and lowering runoff nitrate losses.

Keywords: soil health; grazing systems; runoff-nitrate; strategic grazing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/558/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/558/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:558-:d:307717

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().