Effect of Intersecting Angle on Pedestrian Crowd Flow under Normal and Evacuation Conditions

Kayvan Aghabayk, Kiarash Radmehr and Nirajan Shiwakoti
Additional contact information
Kayvan Aghabayk: School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran P.O.Box 4563-11155, Iran
Kiarash Radmehr: School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran P.O.Box 4563-11155, Iran
Nirajan Shiwakoti: School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Carlton 3053, VI, Australia

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 4, 1-16

Abstract: Complex pedestrian or passenger crowd movements, such as intersecting movements, can create a bottleneck resulting in delays during emergency escape from public infrastructure such as major public transport hubs. Limited studies have examined the effect of different intersecting angles and walking speeds on pedestrian outflow. This study aims to systematically investigate the effect of different intersecting angles (30°, 90°, and 150°) and walking speeds (normal walking, faster walking) on pedestrian outflow at an intersecting path or junction through controlled laboratory experiments. Further, we consider both blocked vision and un-blocked vision in our experiments. The results from our experiments show that the acute angle of 30° has a higher flow rate and less evacuation time as compared to the other angles. The obtuse intersecting angle of 150° was the most undesirable intersecting angle in terms of outflow, evacuation time, and delays at the junction. Faster walking generally led to reduced evacuation time as compared to normal walking. It is also interesting to note that the results from both blocked vision and un-blocked vision were not statistically significant, suggesting that line of sight was not an important factor in regulating the flow at the junction. The results from our findings are a valuable resource to verify the mathematical model intended to simulate pedestrian or passenger crowd movements and behavior within major public infrastructure under both normal and evacuation conditions.

Keywords: passengers; architecture; safety management; evacuation; transport hubs; buildings (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1301/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1301/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1301-:d:319058

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().