A Study of the Relative Stock Market Performance of Companies Recognized for Supporting Gender Equality Policies and Practices

Leonardo Badea, Daniel Ştefan Armeanu, Dan Costin Nițescu, Valentin Murgu, Iulian Panait () and Boris Kuzman
Additional contact information
Leonardo Badea: Department of Finances-Accountancy, Valahia University of Târgovişte, 130024 Târgovişte, Romania
Daniel Ştefan Armeanu: Department of Finance, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania
Dan Costin Nițescu: Department of Money and Banking, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania
Valentin Murgu: Department of Money and Banking, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania
Boris Kuzman: Institute of Agricultural Economics, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 9, 1-20

Abstract: This paper explores the relative stock market performance of well-diversified gender equality equity indices in comparison with the overall market, taking both a cross-sectoral and a financial sector approach, for the period January 2017 to March 2020, with a sample of 11 indices and 834 daily observations, and using several different statistical and econometric methods. Our results show a high level of dynamic conditional correlation of daily returns among the gender equality and the overall indices. We also found comparable levels of conditional volatility (resulting from an Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (EGARCH)model) and an elevated degree of synchronization of the volatility regimes (identified by a Markov switching model). Calibrating simple linear quantile regressions, we found that the value of the slope coefficients of the hypothetical linear relationship between the gender equality indices and the overall market indices are close to one, and relatively stable in relation with the value of the quantile. Using separate Vector Autoregressive (VAR) models for the cross-sectoral indices and for the financial sector indices, we found only very little evidence of causality and spill-over effects. Based on these results, we argue that the daily returns of the gender equality indices exhibited very similar characteristics with the daily returns of the overall market indices. In our interpretation, this could mean that, limited to our sample and methods of investigation, there were not significant differences in the investors’ preferences towards the equity issued by public companies committed to supporting gender equality, in comparison with their approach towards listed equity in general. It could also mean that investors do not yet anticipate the significantly different financial performance of listed companies stemming from their approach towards gender equality.

Keywords: gender equality; Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG); sustainability; equity markets; volatility; correlation; Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (EGARCH); Markov switching; Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC); quantile regression; Vector Autoregressive (VAR) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3558/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3558/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3558-:d:351110

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().