Life-Cycle Assessment of Carbon Footprint of Bike-Share and Bus Systems in Campus Transit

Sishen Wang, Hao Wang, Pengyu Xie and Xiaodan Chen
Additional contact information
Sishen Wang: College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310012, China
Hao Wang: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
Pengyu Xie: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
Xiaodan Chen: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 13, issue 1, 1-14

Abstract: Low-carbon transport system is desired for sustainable cities. The study aims to compare carbon footprint of two transportation modes in campus transit, bus and bike-share systems, using life-cycle assessment (LCA). A case study was conducted for the four-campus (College Ave, Cook/Douglass, Busch, Livingston) transit system at Rutgers University (New Brunswick, NJ). The life-cycle of two systems were disaggregated into four stages, namely, raw material acquisition and manufacture, transportation, operation and maintenance, and end-of-life. Three uncertain factors—fossil fuel type, number of bikes provided, and bus ridership—were set as variables for sensitivity analysis. Normalization method was used in two impact categories to analyze and compare environmental impacts. The results show that the majority of CO 2 emission and energy consumption comes from the raw material stage (extraction and upstream production) of the bike-share system and the operation stage of the campus bus system. The CO 2 emission and energy consumption of the current campus bus system are 46 and 13 times of that of the proposed bike-share system, respectively. Three uncertain factors can influence the results: (1) biodiesel can significantly reduce CO 2 emission and energy consumption of the current campus bus system; (2) the increased number of bikes increases CO 2 emission of the bike-share system; (3) the increase of bus ridership may result in similar impact between two systems. Finally, an alternative hybrid transit system is proposed that uses campus buses to connect four campuses and creates a bike-share system to satisfy travel demands within each campus. The hybrid system reaches the most environmentally friendly state when 70% passenger-miles provided by campus bus and 30% by bike-share system. Further research is needed to consider the uncertainty of biking behavior and travel choice in LCA. Applicable recommendations include increasing ridership of campus buses and building a bike-share in campus to support the current campus bus system. Other strategies such as increasing parking fees and improving biking environment can also be implemented to reduce automobile usage and encourage biking behavior.

Keywords: life-cycle assessment; campus bus system; bike-share system; CO 2 emission; energy consumption; hybrid system (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/158/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/158/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:158-:d:468559

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().