Effects of Compression Ratio of Bio-Fueled SI Engines on the Thermal Balance and Waste Heat Recovery Potential

Ali Qasemian, Sina Jenabi Haghparast, Pouria Azarikhah and Meisam Babaie
Additional contact information
Ali Qasemian: School of Automotive engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 1684613114, Iran
Sina Jenabi Haghparast: School of Automotive engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 1684613114, Iran
Pouria Azarikhah: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 1684613114, Iran
Meisam Babaie: School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4BR, UK

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 11, 1-21

Abstract: In internal combustion engines, a significant share of the fuel energy is wasted via the heat losses. This study aims to understand the heat losses and analyze the potential of the waste heat recovery when biofuels are used in SI engines. A numerical model is developed for a single-cylinder, four-stroke and air-cooled SI engine to carry out the waste heat recovery analysis. To verify the numerical solution, experiments are first conducted for the gasoline engine. Biofuels including pure ethanol (E100), E15 (15% ethanol) and E85 (85% ethanol) are then studied using the validated numerical model. Furthermore, the exhaust power to heat loss ratio ( Q ? e x / Q ? h t ) is investigated for different compression ratios, ethanol fuel content and engine speed to understand the exhaust losses potential in terms of the heat recovery. The results indicate that heat loss to brake power ratio ( Q ? h t / W ? b ) increases by the increment in the compression ratio. In addition, increasing the compression ratio leads to decreasing the Q ? e x / Q ? h t ratio for all studied fuels. According to the results, there is a direct relationship between the ethanol in fuel content and Q ? e x / Q ? h t ratio. As the percentage of ethanol in fuel increases, the Q ? e x / Q ? h t ratio rises. Thus, the more the ethanol in the fuel and the less the compression ratio, the more the potential for the waste heat recovery of the IC engine. Considering both power and waste heat recovery, the most efficient fuel is E100 due to the highest brake thermal efficiency and Q ? e x / Q ? h t ratio and E85, E15 and E00 (pure gasoline) come next in the consecutive orders. At the engine speeds and compression ratios examined in this study (3000 to 5000 rpm and a CR of 8 to 11), the maximum efficiency is about 35% at 5000 rpm and the compression ratio of 11 for E100. The minimum percentage of heat loss is 21.62 happening at 5000 rpm and the compression ratio of 8 by E100. The minimum percentage of exhaust loss is 35.8% happening at 3000 rpm and the compression ratio of 11 for E00. The most Q ? e x / Q ? h t is 2.13 which is related to E100 at the minimum compression ratio of 8.

Keywords: internal combustion engine; energy balance; compression ratio; ethanol biofuel; waste heat recovery (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5921/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5921/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5921-:d:561329

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().