Economic Feasibility and Sustainability Assessment of Residual Municipal Solid Waste Management Scenarios in NSW, Australia

Behnam Hosseini Dastjerdi, Vladimir Strezov, Ravinder Kumar and Masud Behnia
Additional contact information
Behnam Hosseini Dastjerdi: Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
Vladimir Strezov: Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
Ravinder Kumar: Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
Masud Behnia: Macquarie Graduate School of Management, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 16, 1-12

Abstract: This study evaluates the economic cost and sustainability of treating residual municipal solid waste (MSW) through five waste management scenarios. In the baseline scenario (Bsc), all waste was managed through landfilling, while in scenario 1 (Sc1) all waste was treated by incineration. Sc2 employed anaerobic digestion (AD) for food waste and landfilling, and Sc3 treated the waste through AD for food waste, incineration of combustible and plastic wastes, and landfilling. Sc4 treated the waste using AD, incineration, landfilling, and recycling of the plastic waste. The economic cost of waste management scenarios was estimated by calculating different economic variables, such as gate fees, including capital and operating costs, governmental incentives and levies, and also the potential of employed waste treatment technologies for resource recovery. The results revealed that Sc3 has the lowest economic cost of 238.1 mAUD/year, followed by Sc1 (261.9 mAUD/year), while Bsc proved to be the highest cost at 476.1 mAUD/year for MSW treatment. It was noticed that scenarios employing incineration had lower economic costs compared to Bsc and Sc2, mainly because incineration resulted in higher electricity generation and reduced greenhouse gas emissions. The sustainability assessment results confirmed that Sc3 had the lowest and Bcs the highest total economic cost and environmental damage.

Keywords: economic cost; sustainability; waste to energy; recycling; incineration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8972/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8972/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8972-:d:612238

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().