EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Measuring the Supply of Ecosystem Services from Alternative Soil and Nutrient Management Practices: A Transdisciplinary, Field-Scale Approach

Alissa White, Joshua W. Faulkner, David Conner, Lindsay Barbieri, E. Carol Adair, Meredith T. Niles, V. Ernesto Mendez and Cameron R. Twombly
Additional contact information
Alissa White: Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
Joshua W. Faulkner: Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
David Conner: Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
Lindsay Barbieri: Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
E. Carol Adair: Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
Meredith T. Niles: Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
V. Ernesto Mendez: Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
Cameron R. Twombly: FB Environmental Associates, Portland, ME 04101, USA

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 18, 1-32

Abstract: Farmers and policy makers pursue management practices that enhance water quality, increase landscape flood resiliency, and mitigate agriculture’s contribution to climate change, all while remaining economically viable. This study presents a holistic assessment of how two practices influence the supply of these ecosystem services—the use of an aerator prior to manure application in haylands, and the stacked use of manure injection, cover crops, and reduced tillage in corn silage production. Field data are contextualized by semi-structured interviews that identify influences on adoption. Causal loop diagrams then illustrate feedbacks from ecosystem services onto decision making. In our study, unseen nutrient pathways are the least understood, but potentially the most important in determining the impact of a practice on ecosystem services supply. Subsurface runoff accounted for 64% to 92% of measured hydrologic phosphorus export. Average soil surface greenhouse gas flux constituted 38% to 73% of all contributions to the equivalent CO 2 footprint of practices, sometimes outweighing carbon sequestration. Farmers identified interest in better understanding unseen nutrient pathways, expressed intrinsic stewardship motivations, but highlighted financial considerations as dominating decision making. Our analysis elevates the importance of financial supports for conservation, and the need for comprehensive understandings of agroecosystem performance that include hard-to-measure pathways.

Keywords: agroecology; agriculture; decisions; tradeoffs; social-ecological systems; water quality; climate regulation; soil health; aerator; manure injection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10303/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10303/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10303-:d:636165

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10303-:d:636165