Living Labs: From Niche to Mainstream Innovation Management

Katharina Greve, Riccardo De Vita, Seppo Leminen and Mika Westerlund
Additional contact information
Katharina Greve: Centre for Science, Technology & Innovation Policy, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FS, UK
Riccardo De Vita: The Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC), Business School, University of Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK
Seppo Leminen: Department of Business, Strategy and Political Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, 7053 Drammen, Norway
Mika Westerlund: Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 2, 1-25

Abstract: Living Labs have received increasing attention over the last decade. However, despite their growing popularity and ability to positively impact organisations’ innovation performance, mainstream innovation management literature has overlooked the diverse and promising Living Labs research landscape. In an effort to move the field forward, this study analyses extant Living Labs literature in the domain of innovation management. The study identifies conceptual bases informing Living Labs research, maps the collaboration between scholars in the field, examines prevailing themes influencing the debate and reveals the influence of Living Labs research on other domains. Bibliometric methods of co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence analysis as well as bibliographic coupling are employed on two databases. Database A includes 97 focal journal articles and Database B includes all cited sources of Database A, totalling 500 documents. This study reveals the rapid growth of the scholarly literature on Living Labs in the innovation management domain, driven by a core group of authors. However, other contributions from highly visible scholars have the potential to connect Living Lab research to mainstream innovation management studies. The study also identifies the influence of Living Labs research in different application fields and potential for its further evolution.

Keywords: living lab; innovation; bibliometric analysis; bibliometric methods; co-authorship analysis; innovation management; systematic literature review; open innovation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/791/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/791/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:791-:d:480733

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().