EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Fish Stock Assessment for Data-Poor Fisheries, with a Case Study of Tropical Hilsa Shad ( Tenualosa ilisha ) in the Water of Bangladesh

Mohammed Shahidul Alam, Qun Liu, Md. Rashed-Un- Nabi and Md. Abdullah Al-Mamun
Additional contact information
Mohammed Shahidul Alam: College of Fisheries, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
Qun Liu: College of Fisheries, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
Md. Rashed-Un- Nabi: Department of Fisheries, University of Chittagong, Chittagong 4331, Bangladesh
Md. Abdullah Al-Mamun: College of Fisheries, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 7, 1-23

Abstract: The anadromous tropical Hilsa shad formed the largest single-species fishery in Bangladesh, making the highest contribution to the country’s total fish production (14%) and nearly 83% of the global Hilsa catch in 2018. However, increased fishing pressure made the fishery vulnerable, and hence, information on the stock condition and its response to the current degree of removal is essential to explore the future potential for sustainable exploitation. This study carried out a rigorous assessment based on three different methodological approaches (traditional length-frequency based stock assessment method for fishing mortality and exploitation, Froese’s length-based indicators for fishing sustainability, and a surplus production-based Monte Carlo method-CMSY, for fisheries reference points estimation) for the best possible estimates of the Hilsa stock status in the water of Bangladesh. The present findings revealed that the stock is likely to be overfished due to over-exploitation. Depending on the outputs, this study recommended a lower length limit for the catch (>33 cm), distinguished a selectivity pattern (mesh size limit ? 8 cm), and proposed a yearly landing limit (within the range of 263,000–315,000 tons) for the sustainable management of the Hilsa fishery in Bangladesh.

Keywords: Hilsa fishery; stock assessment; three different methodological approaches; over-exploitation and depleted stock biomass; management recommendations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3604/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3604/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3604-:d:523173

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3604-:d:523173