When Does CSR Fail to Incentive Employees’ Affective Organizational Commitment? Exploring the Moderating Effects Based on the C-S-R Concerns Model

Hongqing He, Yameng Zhang and Yaqi Ding
Additional contact information
Hongqing He: International Business School Suzhou, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China
Yameng Zhang: International Business School Suzhou, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China
Yaqi Ding: School of Juris Master, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 13, 1-20

Abstract: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a strategy employed to engage stakeholders. Prior studies explored the different mechanisms by which employees, as one of an organization’s biggest stakeholder groups, positively respond to organizational CSR behavior. However, limited attention has been paid to the conditional boundaries when employees’ positive responses are stronger or weaker, overlooking the possibility that sometimes CSR fails to obtain employees’ support. The study employed the “C-S-R concerns” model to systematically investigate how caring-based (i.e., moral identity), self-based (i.e., corporate ability), and relational-based (i.e., importance of CSR) factors moderate the relationship between perceived CSR (PCSR) and affective organizational commitment (AOC). Using data collected from 326 employees in the Chinese high-tech industry, we found that the positive effects of employees’ PCSR on their AOC becomes negative when employees have higher levels of moral identity, when their organizations are perceived as having greater ability, and when CSR is perceived as more important to the success of their organization. The findings advance our understanding of the inconclusive impacts of CSR on firm performance by providing micro-level evidence from employees. This also provides practical implications for managers about how to select employees, set CSR strategies and cultivate organizational cultures.

Keywords: corporate social responsibilty (CSR); affective organizational commitment; social identity theory; social exchange theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8115/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8115/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8115-:d:854667

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().