Performance Loss Rates of a 1 MWp PV Plant with Various Tilt Angle, Orientation and Installed Environment in the Capital of Cyprus

Turgut Karahüseyin and Serkan Abbasoğlu
Additional contact information
Turgut Karahüseyin: Department of Energy System Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Cyprus International University, Via Mersin 10, Nicosia 99010, Turkey
Serkan Abbasoğlu: Department of Energy System Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Cyprus International University, Via Mersin 10, Nicosia 99010, Turkey

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 15, 1-23

Abstract: Evolution from fossil fuel sources to environmentally friendly and sustainable energy sources is one of the key aspects of the energy transition goal. On the other hand, Solar Photovoltaic systems are the most promising and improving technologies in the energy market However, it is well known that the performance of PV panels decreases in the process of time. This paper focuses on analyzing the performance loss rates (PLR) of mid-scale crystalline silicon (c-Si) PV systems of the same manufacturer with different orientations and tilt angles in the same region for the duration of four years of outdoor exposure. Three commonly used statistical methods are deployed to calculate PLRs; seasonal and trend decomposition using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (STL), classical seasonal decomposition (CSD) and year on year (YoY) methods coupled with various performance metrics, namely Performance ratio (PR), temperature corrected performance ratio TCPR) and weather corrected performance ratio suggested by National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NRELPR). It is found that PLRs of analyzed venues, Arazi, Arena and Stonite, with the YOY approach are −1.2%/year, −0.73%/year and −2.65%/year, respectivelty., respectively. Furthermore, STL method demonstrated PLRs of −0.69%/year, −0.65%/year and −2.91%/year, respectively. On the other hand, the CSD method generated positive PLRs for some inverters while aforementioned statistical approaches proposed PLRs close to −2%/year, making the CSD method inappropriate for use under a heavy soiling environment. Within two km distance, variations up-to four-fold in PLRs are recorded between the venues during analyzed period. Furthermore, variations in PLRs are more dependent on the statistical approach rather than the performance metric.

Keywords: performance loss rate; degradation; PLR; photovoltaic (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9084/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9084/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9084-:d:870830

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().