How Social Impressions Affect Public Acceptance of Nuclear Energy: A Case Study in China

Jie Yang, Jie Wang, Xiaofeng Zhang, Chunqi Shen and Zhijuan Shao ()
Additional contact information
Jie Yang: School of Environment Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China
Jie Wang: School of Environment Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China
Xiaofeng Zhang: Suzhou Nuclear Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215004, China
Chunqi Shen: School of Environment Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China
Zhijuan Shao: School of Environment Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 18, 1-23

Abstract: Expanding the proportion of nuclear energy to shift the current energy structure and reduce carbon emission has been acknowledged by the China National Energy Administration. As a typical NIMBY facility, nuclear power plants are faced with a dilemma. Increasing the public acceptance of nuclear power is important for its development. Although multiple studies have shown the factors affecting the public acceptance, few of them focused on the effects of social impression brought about by nuclear power on public attitudes. In this study, a theoretical model was established to examine the impact of social impression (including impression management and stigmatization), knowledge, social trust, perceived risk, and perceived benefit on the public acceptance of nuclear energy. The data in this study were obtained through a questionnaire survey (N = 577) of residents near the Fangchenggang Nuclear Power Plant in China. The results showed that impression management did not directly affect the acceptance but had a positive effect on knowledge. Knowledge and perceived risk or perceived benefit play roles as chain intermediaries between impression management and public acceptance. Stigmatization negatively affects the social trust and public acceptance of nuclear energy. Social trust and perceived risk or perceived benefit act as chain intermediaries between stigmatization and public acceptance. The path “impression management affects knowledge, and knowledge affects perceived risk, then perceived risk finally affects public acceptance” is optimal among all the paths. Moreover, knowledge has no significant effect on public acceptance but negatively affects perceived risk. Social trust positively affects perceived benefit and public acceptance. It is also indicated that perceived benefit has a stronger effect on public acceptance than perceived risk. The findings in this study could inform the government regarding potential social management and recommendations on policy making.

Keywords: public perception; nuclear energy; public acceptance; risk communication (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11190/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11190/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11190-:d:908869

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().