Sustainability Reporting through Environmental, Social, and Governance: A Bibliometric Review

Mathew Kevin Bosi, Nelson Lajuni (), Avnner Chardles Wellfren and Thien Sang Lim
Additional contact information
Mathew Kevin Bosi: Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Kota Kinabalu 88400, Malaysia
Nelson Lajuni: Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Kota Kinabalu 88400, Malaysia
Avnner Chardles Wellfren: Centre of Postgraduate Studies, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Kota Kinabalu 88400, Malaysia
Thien Sang Lim: Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Kota Kinabalu 88400, Malaysia

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 19, 1-22

Abstract: Research on sustainability reporting is becoming increasingly important. Despite the growing body of literature on sustainability reporting, little is known about its past trends and how research areas might evolve in the future. Recognizing and understanding the research trend related to sustainability reporting will enable future researchers to plan and conduct research that is of high interest and impact in terms of both readership and citations. This study examines a large body of literature on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and sustainability reporting over the last 24 years (1998–2022). The study used bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer software to perform publication trends, citation analysis, and keyword mapping analysis. Data for the analysis was extracted from the online database Scopus on 24 April 2022. Uniquely, the study also employed the Gephi technique, version 0.9.5 of bibliometric analysis, to uncover past ESG research trends and sustainability reports and predict how the content of these study areas will evolve in the future. Based on a sample size of 358 articles, most publications were published in English and in open-access journals. The resultant outcomes of the Gephi technique show that the ESG and sustainability reports can be merged into four clusters. The first cluster points out that corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability reporting now have a stronger social focus as they focus on benefits and environmental impacts. The second cluster focuses on benefits and corporate social responsibility rewards. The third cluster emphasizes the cost of equity and ESG disclosure. Finally, the fourth cluster emphasizes the cost of capital and governance in CSR. The research cluster’s discovery sheds light for future researchers in planning and designing future research focuses.

Keywords: sustainability reporting; environmental; social; governance; bibliometrics analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12071/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12071/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12071-:d:923814

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().