Social Insurance Burden and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from China

Nai-Chun Wang, Deng-Kui Si () and Chun-Feng Dong
Additional contact information
Nai-Chun Wang: School of Economics, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266061, China
Deng-Kui Si: School of Economics, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266061, China
Chun-Feng Dong: Institute of Finance and Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 19, 1-22

Abstract: Appropriate social insurance contribution rates are crucial for the green development of firms. While the existing literature lacks an exploration of the relationship between social insurance policy and corporate environmental performance, this paper empirically examines the impact of social insurance contributions on corporate environmental performance using unbalanced panel data of 2947 A-share listed firms in China from 2008 to 2019. Our study shows that there is an inverted-U-shaped relationship between the social insurance burden and firms’ environmental performance, and the result remains robust after changing the measurements of core variables, replacing estimation method, and controlling endogenous problems. The inverted-U-shaped relationship is more pronounced in non-heavily polluting industries, non-labor-intensive industries, and non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs). In addition, corporate innovation and digital transformation can positively moderate the inverted-U-shaped effect of social insurance burden on corporate environmental performance, and firms should grasp the “double-edged sword” effect of innovation and digital transformation in different periods of social insurance burden. Further analysis reveals that a reasonable social insurance burden can enhance firm value and risk taking through improving firms’ environmental performance, whereas an excessive social insurance burden is not conducive to the improvement of firms’ environmental performance, internal value creation, and risk taking.

Keywords: social insurance burden; environmental performance; innovation; digital transformation; enterprise value; risk taking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12104/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12104/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12104-:d:924415

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().