Implementing a Design Thinking Approach to De-Risk the Digitalisation of Manufacturing SMEs

David Mesa (), Gianni Renda, Robert Gorkin, Blair Kuys and Simon M. Cook
Additional contact information
David Mesa: Design Factory Melbourne, Hawthorn Campus, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia
Gianni Renda: School of Design and Architecture, Hawthorn Campus, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia
Robert Gorkin: Eudaemon Technologies Pty Ltd., Sydney 2000, Australia
Blair Kuys: School of Design and Architecture, Hawthorn Campus, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia
Simon M. Cook: Eudaemon Technologies Pty Ltd., Sydney 2000, Australia

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 21, 1-20

Abstract: Industry 4.0 (I4.0) has proposed a significant shift in the way companies approach manufacturing. However, this new paradigm is not without faults. The integration of processes and equipment (‘digitalisation’) can be prohibitively expensive or too technically complex for small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) with limited resources and technical expertise. Another barrier to digitalisation lies in the ambiguity of not knowing what precise practices to adopt to improve productivity. Although these challenges have been identified in the literature, there is still little evidence on how to tackle them. Thus, we explore how design thinking can help overcome these challenges, given that it has been used in many organisations and disciplines to deal with complex and ambiguous problems. We do so by investigating the research question ‘How can designers and design thinking processes assist manufacturing SMEs’ digitalisation?’ We address this research question by presenting a case study of a university–industry collaboration where the authors utilised a design-thinking process to select and implement technologies to capture, process and analyse data for an Australian medical device manufacturer. By reflecting on the case study, we identified the user-centeredness of design thinking as crucial in selecting technologies for implementation that prioritised usability and brought value to all stakeholders. Furthermore, iterative prototyping was critical to scale up the required expertise and deliver a successful sustainable solution without investing vast resources. Our work suggests that designers and design thinking have the potential to help de-risk digitalisation. Finally, we suggest a framework that may assist in guiding other SMEs approaching digitalisation and provide a starting point for further design thinking research in this area.

Keywords: design thinking; digitalisation; industry 4.0; design; advanced manufacturing; IoT (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14358/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14358/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14358-:d:961424

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().