An Evaluation of the Impact of Databases on End-of-Life Embodied Carbon Estimation

Augustine Blay-Armah, Ali Bahadori-Jahromi, Anastasia Mylona, Mark Barthorpe and Marco Ferri
Additional contact information
Augustine Blay-Armah: Department of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, School of Computing and Engineering, University of West London, London W5 5RF, UK
Ali Bahadori-Jahromi: Department of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, School of Computing and Engineering, University of West London, London W5 5RF, UK
Anastasia Mylona: Research Department, The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE), London SW12 9BS, UK
Mark Barthorpe: LIDL Great Britain Ltd., 19 Worple Road, London SW19 4JS, UK
Marco Ferri: LIDL Great Britain Ltd., 19 Worple Road, London SW19 4JS, UK

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 4, 1-13

Abstract: The growing awareness of the need to minimise greenhouse gas (GHG) and mitigate climate change has resulted in a greater focus on the embodied carbon ( EC ) of construction material. One way to ensure the environmental impact of building activities is minimised to a reasonable level is the calculation of their EC . Whilst there are a few studies investigating the role of embodied carbon factor (ECF) databases on the accuracy of EC calculation from cradle to gate, very little is known about the impact of different databases on the end-of-life (EoL) EC calculation. Using ECFs derived from the UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) default values and the Institution of Structural Engineers (IStructE) suggested percentages for different elements of a building’s lifecycle stages, this study presents the impact of different data sources on the calculation of EoL EC . The study revealed that a lack of EoL ECFs databases could result in a significant difference of about 61% and 141% in the calculation of EC .

Keywords: embodied carbon; embodied carbon factor databases; end of life; life cycle assessment; recycling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2307/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2307/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2307-:d:752030

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().