EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Green Fences for Buenos Aires: Implementing Green Infrastructure for (More than) Air Quality

María del Carmen Redondo Bermúdez, Juan Miguel Kanai, Janice Astbury, Verónica Fabio and Anna Jorgensen
Additional contact information
María del Carmen Redondo Bermúdez: Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
Juan Miguel Kanai: Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
Janice Astbury: Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
Verónica Fabio: Faculty of Architecture, Design and Urbanism, University of Buenos Aires, Intendente Güiraldes 2160, Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina
Anna Jorgensen: Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 7, 1-23

Abstract: Schoolyards in North America and Europe are increasingly using green fences as one measure to protect vulnerable populations from localised air pollution. This paper assesses the possibilities and limits for mobilising this format of site-specific green infrastructure in cities in low- and middle-income countries beset by air pollution and multiple other socio-environmental challenges, and particularly questions the definition of green fences as a green infrastructure for air quality (GI4AQ). We applied several qualitative and action research methods to the question of green fence implementation in Buenos Aires, Argentina—a Latin American city with weak air-quality policies, limited green infrastructure, and little experience with nature-based solutions. Firstly, we conducted a literature review of the role that urban vegetation and ecosystem services may play in AQ policy and the implementation barriers to such approaches globally and in the city. Secondly, we planned, designed, constructed, maintained, and evaluated a pilot green fence in a school playground. Thirdly, we carried out supplementary interviews with stakeholders and expert informants and compiled project members’ narratives to respectively characterise the barriers that the project encountered and delineate its attributes based on the associated actions that we took to overcome such barriers to implementation and complete the pilot. Our findings identify multiple barriers across seven known categories (institutional, engagement, political, socio-cultural, built environment and natural landscape, knowledge base and financial) and highlight examples not previously considered in the extant international literature. Furthermore, learning from this experience, the paper proposes an expanded model of green infrastructure for air quality plus multi-dimensional co-benefits (GI4AQ+) to increase implementation chances by attending to local needs and priorities.

Keywords: action research; nature-based solutions; air quality; green infrastructure; urban environmental policy; Latin America (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4129/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4129/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4129-:d:783540

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4129-:d:783540