EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Method of Construction Projects’ Classification for Habitat Assessment in Poland and the Problem of Choosing Materials Solutions

Jolanta Harasymiuk and Elżbieta Szafranko
Additional contact information
Jolanta Harasymiuk: Institute of Geodesy and Civil Engineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Geoengineering, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
Elżbieta Szafranko: Institute of Geodesy and Civil Engineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Geoengineering, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 7, 1-21

Abstract: The planning stage plays a key role in the success of each construction project. It also pertains to projects implementedin the Natura 2000 areas that cover ca. 18% of the total land area in the EU. Permission for the realization of such a project is issued after an analysis of its environmental impact on the Natura 2000 area. An important part of the analysis undertaken as part of a habitat assessment should be the evaluation of proposed material solutions. The research has revealed that habitat assessments in Poland do not fulfill this postulation. The decision-making process is based on the legal qualification criteria, and the fundamental importance in it has a precautionary principle. Practical realization of this principle demonstrates, however, shortcomings in its methodology. The article presents the results of two research stages. In the first stage, the documentation of 292 construction projects was examined in order to prepare the principal components of a checklist. They are correlated to the legal qualification criteria. However, they are more precise and systematic. In the second stage of the research, a survey of 47 experts was performed, and the result of the research is an innovative module of the checklist for qualification of construction projects to the habitat assessment, including questions on materials solutions. The research has proved that introduction of this proposal to the checklist may improve the quality of habitat assessments, increase their trustworthiness and ensure full exploitation of the possibilities which are given by the use of uniform research methods.

Keywords: construction project; Natura 2000; habitat assessment; environmental decision problems; precautionary principle; materials solutions; checklist; Poland (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4277/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4277/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4277-:d:786754

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4277-:d:786754