Soil and Water Conservation Techniques in Tropical and Subtropical Asia: A Review

Bin Huang, Zaijian Yuan, Mingguo Zheng, Yishan Liao, Kim Loi Nguyen, Thi Hong Nguyen, Samran Sombatpanit and Dingqiang Li
Additional contact information
Bin Huang: Guangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Agro-Environmental Pollution Control and Management, Institute of Eco-Environment and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
Zaijian Yuan: Guangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Agro-Environmental Pollution Control and Management, Institute of Eco-Environment and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
Mingguo Zheng: Guangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Agro-Environmental Pollution Control and Management, Institute of Eco-Environment and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
Yishan Liao: Guangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Agro-Environmental Pollution Control and Management, Institute of Eco-Environment and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
Kim Loi Nguyen: Research Center for Climate Change, Nong Lam University, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
Thi Hong Nguyen: Faculty of Geology, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
Samran Sombatpanit: Land Development Department, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
Dingqiang Li: Guangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Agro-Environmental Pollution Control and Management, Institute of Eco-Environment and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 9, 1-19

Abstract: Soil and water loss is a severe environmental problem in tropical and subtropical Asia (TSA). This review systematically summarizes the techniques that have been widely applied in the TSA region and compares the conservation efficiency of these techniques based on the runoff and sediment reduction ratios ( η r and η s ). The results show that the current techniques can be divided into biological, engineering and agricultural practice measures, and in most cases, their efficiencies in reducing sediment loss ( η s = 14.0–99.5%, 61.3–100.0% and 0.6–95.4%, respectively) were higher than in reducing runoff loss ( η r = 2.8–9.38%, 0.28–83.3% and 1.62–70.2%, respectively). Monocultures of single tree species (e.g., Pinus massoniana ) sometimes showed very limited conservation effects. Vetiver and alfalfa were more effective at reducing soil loss than other hedgerow species. Contour tillage, ridge farming, and reduced tillage generally showed high efficiencies in reducing soil loss compared with other agricultural practice measures. The combination of engineering and biological techniques could more effectively reduce soil and water loss compared with the application of these techniques along. Future works should be conducted to build unified technical standards and reasonable comprehensive evaluation systems, to combine these techniques with environmental engineering technologies, and to develop new amendment materials.

Keywords: tropical and subtropical Asia; soil erosion; soil and water conservation; ecological engineering techniques; runoff reduction ratio; sediment reduction ratio (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5035/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5035/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5035-:d:799711

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().