EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluation System Creation and Application of “Zero-Pollution Village” Based on Combined FAHP-TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of Zhejiang Province

Ying Xu, Meiyan Wang, Yicheng Xu, Xin Li, Yun Wu and Fang’ai Chi ()
Additional contact information
Ying Xu: College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
Meiyan Wang: College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
Yicheng Xu: College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
Xin Li: College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
Yun Wu: College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
Fang’ai Chi: College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 16, 1-26

Abstract: With the implementation of China’s rural revitalization strategy, the construction of low-pollution villages has become an urgent demand for rural residents to achieve an ecologically livable environment. This paper aims to construct a new evaluation system for a “zero-pollution village” inspired by the principle of CASBEE. A village is regarded as a relatively independent ecosystem, and the evaluation system is designed to improve the “internal environmental quality Q” of a village while reducing the “external environmental load L”. Thus, the evaluation system included two target strata (Q and L) and 3 layers comprising 6 criteria layers, 21 sub-criteria layers, and 76 indicators in the indicator layers. A new combined weight method based on FAHP-TOPSIS was presented to determine the weights of each layer of indicators. After verifying the evaluation system by applying it to 3 representative villages, 26 villages in Zhejiang Province were evaluated. These results indicate that the evaluation system was effective for evaluating the construction of a zero-pollution village. The current village environment in Zhejiang Province has been significantly improved; however, the vast majority of villages have not yet reached the zero-pollution standard.

Keywords: rural communities; zero-pollution village; evaluation system; CASBEE; FAHP; TOPSIS; combined weight; integrated weight (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12367/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12367/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12367-:d:1217175

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12367-:d:1217175