Escaping the Lock-in to Pesticide Use: Do Vietnamese Farmers Respond to Flower Strips as a Restoration Practice or Pest Management Action?

Finbarr G. Horgan (), Quynh Vu, Enrique A. Mundaca, Shweta Dabholkar, Mark Davis, Josef Settele and Eduardo Crisol-Martínez ()
Additional contact information
Finbarr G. Horgan: EcoLaVerna Integral Restoration Ecology, Bridestown, T56 P499 Kildinan, Ireland
Quynh Vu: Cuulong Delta Rice Research Institute, Tan Thanh, Thoi Lai District, Can Tho 94000, Vietnam
Enrique A. Mundaca: Escuela de Agronomía, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Universidad Católica del Maule, Casilla 7-D, Curicó 3341695, Chile
Shweta Dabholkar: Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention, University/BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK
Mark Davis: Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention, University/BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK
Josef Settele: Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, 06120 Halle, Germany
Eduardo Crisol-Martínez: EcoLaVerna Integral Restoration Ecology, Bridestown, T56 P499 Kildinan, Ireland

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 16, 1-25

Abstract: Ecological engineering using linear flower strips is proposed as an alternative to insecticide-based rice pest management. However, its success depends on farmers’ appreciations of related interventions as part of an ecosystem restoration process. We examined agronomic and pest management responses to flower strips among 305 farmers surveyed at 12 villages in the Mekong Delta Region (MDR) of Vietnam. Practices by conventional farmers at the same villages were used as a baseline. The ecological engineering farmers mainly integrated flower strips with pest management practices by reducing insecticide applications before 40 days after rice crop establishment (ca 38% of farmers; 9% more than on conventional farms). Flower strips were also associated with less frequent and irregular insecticide applications or with insecticide-free rice (i.e., possibly IPM: ca 19% of ecological engineering farmers). Otherwise, farmers (ca 43% of ecological engineering farmers) continued to apply insecticides prophylactically and, in some cases, applied more insecticides than their conventional neighbors. Flower strips were not associated with reductions in any other pesticides. Reported yields were not directly affected by flower strips or pesticide inputs. Our results suggest that ecological engineering was not widely regarded by participating farmers as an ecosystem restoration practice, but rather, as a pest management action. Further promotion of flower strips as a component of ecosystem restoration is required to break the lock-in to pesticide use at ecologically engineered rice farms in the MDR.

Keywords: agricultural policy; agrochemicals; agroecology; biological control; conservation agriculture; ecosystem resilience; integrated pest management; sustainable rice production (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12508/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12508/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12508-:d:1219303

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().