Experimentally Identifying the Influences of Key Parameters for an Organic Rankine Cycle Using R123

Yan Gao, Qianxi Song, Wen Su (), Xinxing Lin, Zhi Sun, Zhisheng Huang and Yaping Gao
Additional contact information
Yan Gao: Collaborative Innovation Center of Energy Conservation & Emission Reduction, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100037, China
Qianxi Song: Collaborative Innovation Center of Energy Conservation & Emission Reduction, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100037, China
Wen Su: School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Xinxing Lin: Institute of Science and Technology, China Three Gorges Corporation, Beijing 100038, China
Zhi Sun: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand
Zhisheng Huang: Collaborative Innovation Center of Energy Conservation & Emission Reduction, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100037, China
Yaping Gao: Collaborative Innovation Center of Energy Conservation & Emission Reduction, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100037, China

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 1, 1-14

Abstract: As an efficient energy conversion technology, the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) has been widely applied in medium- and low-grade heat sources. In order to explore the experimental performance of ORC and reveal the effects of operation parameters, an experimental setup was built and R123 was selected as the working fluid. In the experiments, the heat source temperature as well as the mass flow rates of the working fluid and cooling water were controlled. Under the design conditions, the net work and cycle efficiency can, respectively, reach up to 0.55 kW and 8.7%. As for the influences of key parameters, with the increase in heat source temperature from 130 °C to 160 °C, the involved heat has a small increase, while the net work increases from 0.44 kW to 0.55 kW, and the cycle efficiency greatly increases from 6.71% to 8.72% at a mass flow rate of working fluid 25 g/s. As for the mass flow rate of cooling water, it has a similar impact on the cycle performances. The difference is that the effect of the cooling water rate is relatively smaller. At the mass flow rate 25 g/s, when the cooling water rate increases from 0.68 kg/s to 0.83 kg/s, the net work varies from 0.46 kW to 0.55 kW, the cycle efficiency increases in the range 7.41~9.4%. Furthermore, except cycle efficiency, all performances are proportional to the mass flow rate of working fluid. In the test range, the difference of cycle efficiency among different mass flow rates is less than 0.7%.

Keywords: organic Rankine cycle; experimental test; thermal efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/814/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/814/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:814-:d:1022862

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().