A Meta-Synthesis Review of Occupant Comfort Assessment in Buildings (2002–2022)

Amir Faraji, Maria Rashidi, Fatemeh Rezaei () and Payam Rahnamayiezekavat
Additional contact information
Amir Faraji: Construction Project Management Department, Faculty of Architecture, KHATAM University, Tehran 1991633357, Iran
Maria Rashidi: School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
Fatemeh Rezaei: Faculty of Architecture, KHATAM University, Tehran 1991633357, Iran
Payam Rahnamayiezekavat: School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 5, 1-36

Abstract: Occupant comfort in buildings is one of the most crucial considerations in designing a building. Accordingly, there is a growing interest in this area. Aspects of comfort include thermal comfort, visual comfort, acoustic comfort, and indoor air quality (IAQ) satisfaction. The objective of this state-of-the-art review was to provide a comprehensive, explicit, and up-to-date literature review on occupant comfort in buildings, since this issue has a great impact on the lifestyle, health, and productivity of occupants. A meta-synthesis method was also used for an analytical-interpretive review of previous studies. In this research, scientific research studies related to the subject of indoor occupant comfort in the period 2002–2022 were reviewed. Previous reviews have often covered the fundamental concepts and principles related to indoor occupant comfort. Although innumerable studies have focused on thermal comfort, other aspects of occupant comfort have not been considered. The review is analyzed and discussed in reference to type of study, case study geographical locations and climate zones, case study building types, decision-making models, assessment criteria, data-collection tools, and data analysis strategies. Finally, future research recommendations are presented. Through the review, we find that the comfort models used in research are mostly based on comfort perception votes collected from experimental studies, which may not reflect the preferences of users well. In addition, only the influence of environmental factors on the models has been investigated, and other personal factors have been ignored. This study presents a useful guide for researchers to determine their outlines for future research in this field.

Keywords: occupant comfort; indoor thermal comfort; visual comfort; acoustic comfort; indoor air quality satisfaction; buildings (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4303/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4303/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4303-:d:1083164

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().