Does Soil Pollution Prevention and Control Promote Corporate Sustainable Development? A Quasi-Natural Experiment of “10-Point Soil Plan” in China

Qiong Zhou, Qian Tan, Huixiang Zeng, Yu-En Lin and Peng Zhu ()
Additional contact information
Qiong Zhou: Business School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Qian Tan: Business School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Huixiang Zeng: Business School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Yu-En Lin: Center for Quantitative Economics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
Peng Zhu: School of Accounting, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410083, China

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 5, 1-20

Abstract: The Action Plan for Soil Pollution Prevention and Control (“10-point Soil Plan”) provides the top-level design for soil environmental protection in China and motivates heavy polluters to participate in soil pollution prevention and control. Using a sample of Chinese-listed firms with key soil pollution regulation from 2013 to 2020, this study utilized the Difference-in-Differences method to analyze the effect and mechanism of the “10-point Soil Plan” on corporate sustainable development. The “10-point Soil Plan” significantly promoted corporate sustainability via debt vacating and cash defense effects. However, this policy failed to achieve innovation compensation. Further, the promotion of corporate sustainability via the “10-point Soil Plan” is more significant in state-owned and large enterprises and depends on the intensity of local environmental regulations. This study provides a valuable reference for government and corporates to actively implement soil pollution prevention and control measures, which complements the systematic study of soil environmental planning and helps China integrate soil environmental planning with water and air environmental planning to build a comprehensive pollution prevention system.

Keywords: corporate sustainable development; “10-point Soil Plan”; debt vacating effect; cash defense effect; innovation compensation effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4598/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4598/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4598-:d:1087621

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().