Digital Ethnography? Our Experiences in the Use of SenseMaker for Understanding Gendered Climate Vulnerabilities amongst Marginalized Agrarian Communities

Deepa Joshi, Anna Panagiotou, Meera Bisht, Upandha Udalagama () and Alexandra Schindler
Additional contact information
Deepa Joshi: International Water Management Institute, 127 Sunil Mawatha, Battaramulla 10120, Sri Lanka
Anna Panagiotou: Cognitive Edge (Cynefin Co.), Abergele Road, Colwyn Bay, Conwy LL29 8BF, UK
Meera Bisht: International Water Management Institute, 127 Sunil Mawatha, Battaramulla 10120, Sri Lanka
Upandha Udalagama: International Water Management Institute, 127 Sunil Mawatha, Battaramulla 10120, Sri Lanka
Alexandra Schindler: International Water Management Institute, 127 Sunil Mawatha, Battaramulla 10120, Sri Lanka

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 9, 1-20

Abstract: Digital innovations and interventions can potentially revolutionize agri-food systems, especially in coping with climate challenges. On a similar note, digital research tools and methods are increasingly popular for the efficient collection and analysis of real-time, large-scale data. It is claimed that these methods can also minimize subjective biases that are prevalent in traditional qualitative research. However, given the digital divide, especially affecting women and marginalized communities, these innovations could potentially introduce further disparities. To assess these contradictions, we piloted SenseMaker, a digital ethnography tool designed to capture individual, embodied experiences, biases, and perceptions to map vulnerabilities and resilience to climate impacts in the Gaya District in Bihar. Our research shows that this digital tool allows for a systematic co-design of the research framework, allows for the collection of large volumes of data in a relatively short time, and a co-analysis of the research data by the researchers and the researched. This process allowed us to map and capture the complexities of intersectional inequalities in relation to climate change vulnerability. However, we also noted that the application of the tool is influenced by the prior exposure to technology (digital devices) of both the enumerators and researched groups and requires significant resources when implemented in contexts where there is a need to translate the data from local dialects and languages to more dominant languages (English). Most importantly, perceptions, positionalities, and biases of researchers can significantly impact the design of the tool’s signification framework, reiterating the fact that researcher bias persists regardless of technological innovations in research methodology.

Keywords: digital ethnography; transdisciplinarity; methodology; SenseMaker; climate change; agriculture; gender (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7196/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7196/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7196-:d:1133131

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().