Analysing Multiple Paths of Urban Low-Carbon Governance: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Method Based on 35 Key Cities in China
You-Dong Li,
Chen-Li Yan,
Yun-Hui Zhao () and
Jia-Qi Bai
Additional contact information
You-Dong Li: School of Business Administration, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot 010051, China
Chen-Li Yan: School of Business Administration, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot 010051, China
Yun-Hui Zhao: School of Business Administration, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot 010051, China
Jia-Qi Bai: School of Business Administration, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot 010051, China
Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 9, 1-20
Abstract:
The city is a crucial space carrier for the country to carry out low-carbon construction and solve sustainable–development problems. However, existing research lacks an in-depth discussion of the complex mechanisms and governance paths of urban low-carbon transformation. Therefore, this study explores multiple paths of urban low-carbon governance (ULCG). This study constructs a theoretical model of ULCG based on the technology–organisation–environment (TOE) framework. It uses fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to analyse the overall and sub-regional paths of 35 key cities in China to explore various ULCG approaches. The following three conclusions are drawn. First, a single antecedent condition is not a necessary condition for ULCG. Second, five differentiated paths have been formed under the joint action of the TOE conditions to improve ULCG. It can be divided into three types: the ULCG model dominated by ‘big data + market’, ‘big data’, and ‘market’. Third, apparent differences exist in the ULCG paths in China’s eastern, central and western regions. The study deepens the rational understanding of multiple factors interacting in the complex mechanism behind urban low-carbon transformation and provides differentiated ULCG paths, enabling cities in eastern, central, and western China to choose low-carbon governance paths tailored to their local conditions based on both a comprehensive perspective and a regional perspective.
Keywords: ULCG; TOE framework; sub-regional paths; fsQCA (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7613/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7613/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7613-:d:1140256
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().