Measuring Social Dimensions of Sustainability at the Community Level: An Illustrative but Cautionary Tale

Cynthia McPherson Frantz (), Ifunanya Ezimora, John E. Petersen, Alexandria Edminster, Md Rumi Shammin and Yunzhang Chi
Additional contact information
Cynthia McPherson Frantz: Department of Psychology and Environmental Studies, Oberlin College, 120 W Lorain Street, Oberlin, OH 44074, USA
Ifunanya Ezimora: Department of Psychology and Environmental Studies, Oberlin College, 120 W Lorain Street, Oberlin, OH 44074, USA
John E. Petersen: Environmental Studies Program and Department of Biology, Oberlin College, 132 Elm Street, Oberlin, OH 44074, USA
Alexandria Edminster: Department of Psychology and Environmental Studies, Oberlin College, 120 W Lorain Street, Oberlin, OH 44074, USA
Md Rumi Shammin: Environmental Studies Program, Oberlin College, 132 Elm Street, Oberlin, OH 44074, USA
Yunzhang Chi: Department of Psychology, Oberlin College, 120 W Lorain Street, Oberlin, OH 44074, USA

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 10, 1-36

Abstract: Many communities are working to enhance the sustainability of their physical, economic, and social systems. While economic and physical systems are routinely measured (e.g., money and energy), psychological and behavioral elements of social systems (norms, attitudes, and individual behavior) are seldom tracked. The objective of this research was to evaluate a potentially scalable approach to measure the impact of sustainability initiatives on these variables in a community engaged in holistic sustainability programming. Online survey data were collected in 2012 ( N = 155) and 2016 ( N = 137), measuring pro-environmental thought and behavior in two towns in Ohio: Oberlin, a community engaged in holistic efforts to enhance environmental sustainability; and a similar community (Berea) used as a control. Survey links were distributed via recruitment letters mailed to randomly selected community residents from a purchased mailing list. We used two (town) by two (time) between subjects’ ANOVAs to evaluate whether Oberlin saw predicted increases in sustainable thought and behavior from 2012 to 2016, compared to the control community. Despite verifiable participation in and awareness of sustainability programs in Oberlin, our survey results did not provide strong evidence that programs resulted in the desired changes in attitudes, norms, and individual behaviors. Recycling attitudes and LED bulb installation were two exceptions. We conclude that assessing the psychological and behavioral dimensions of sustainability poses particular challenges. We encountered ceiling effects and inadequate statistical power. Possibly, norms and attitudes are not easily influenced even by a holistic community-wide effort.

Keywords: sustainable communities; sustainability indicators; sustainability assessment; sustainability factors; pro-environmental behaviors; social norms; pro-environmental attitudes; behavior change; climate action; spillover effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4197/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4197/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4197-:d:1396152

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().