Environmental Protection Tax and China’s Economic Growth: Boost or Slowdown?

Qing Zhao () and Chih-Hung Yuan ()
Additional contact information
Qing Zhao: School of Economics and Commerce, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Zhongshan Institute, Zhongshan 528402, China
Chih-Hung Yuan: School of Economics and Commerce, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Zhongshan Institute, Zhongshan 528402, China

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 23, 1-17

Abstract: This paper explores the impact of China’s environmental protection tax reform on economic growth through empirical research. Using the “fee to tax” policy implemented in China in 2018 as a natural experiment, the analysis is conducted using a strengthened double-difference (DID) model. It is found that environmental protection tax reform has a significant positive impact on regional economic growth, and this conclusion still holds after several robustness tests. In order to explore the mechanism of environmental protection tax in-depth, this paper analyzes the three dimensions of science and technology innovation investment, foreign direct investment, and tax administration intensity. The results show that environmental protection tax does not promote technological innovation of enterprises as expected, but may instead inhibit R&D and innovation activities by increasing the cost pressure on enterprises. The positive impact of environmental protection tax on economic growth is mainly realized by increasing the intensity of tax administration. Furthermore, this paper analyzes the heterogeneity in urban geographic locations and administrative levels, finding that environmental protection taxes have a significant positive effect on economic growth in central and northeastern regions and in cities with lower administrative levels, while they have a negative effect in the eastern region and in cities with higher administrative levels.

Keywords: environmental protection tax; economic growth; scientific and technological innovation; foreign direct investment; tax administration intensity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10203/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10203/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10203-:d:1526569

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().