Design for Six Sigma in the Product Development Process Under a Sustainability Point of View: A Real-Life Case Study

Gabriele Arcidiacono, Edoardo Risaliti and Francesco Del Pero ()
Additional contact information
Gabriele Arcidiacono: Department of Engineering Sciences, Guglielmo Marconi University, 00193 Rome, Italy
Edoardo Risaliti: Department of Engineering Sciences, Guglielmo Marconi University, 00193 Rome, Italy
Francesco Del Pero: Department of Engineering Sciences, Guglielmo Marconi University, 00193 Rome, Italy

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 23, 1-28

Abstract: The modern economic landscape, now more competitive than ever, compels companies to create increasingly innovative, cutting-edge, and cost-effective products. In this regard, the design and development phases play a crucial role, as they closely determine the final satisfaction of the customers. It follows from this the need for a structured approach to product development, which allows companies to identify product key characteristics, also useful when there is the need for carrying out the redesign of an existing product. This work provides the application of the Design For Six Sigma (DFSS) methodology to a real redesign case study, based on the improvement in a specific mountain bike model (baseline product). The final target is identifying the main criticalities and intervention areas for the bicycle, to provide valuable suggestions to designers and developers for creating a new product alternative characterised by an extended horizon to various markets. DFSS is applied to identify and optimise Critical-To-Quality (CTQ) features, aiming at making the project as responsive as possible to customers’ needs. More specifically, two main tasks are addressed. The first one is the application of the identify phase of the IDOV approach (Identify, Design, Optimise, Validate) to identify the most pertinent Voice of the Customers (VOCs) to be implemented in the product. The second main task is the analysis of the integrated product development process carried out through the Six Sigma (SS) methodology, to transform the VOCs into CTQs via the Quality Function Deployment 1 (QFD1) and to prioritise the CTQ to achieve design excellence. The identified improvement strategies are presented and critically discussed in relation to their potential to reduce the environmental impact of the overall Life Cycle (LC) of the product.

Keywords: DFSS (design for six sigma); QFD (quality function deployment); VOC (voice of the customer); CTQ (Critical-To-Quality); competitive benchmarking; project charter; sustainability; life cycle; environmental impact (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10387/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10387/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10387-:d:1530955

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().