Evaluating the Sustainability of Longtime Operating Infrastructure for Romanian Flood Risk Protection
Ioana Popescu (),
Camelia Teau,
Cristian Moisescu-Ciocan,
Constantin Florescu,
Relu Adam and
Albert Titus Constantin
Additional contact information
Ioana Popescu: Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands
Camelia Teau: Department of Hydrotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Politechnica University Timisoara, 300500 Timisoara, Romania
Cristian Moisescu-Ciocan: Department of Hydrotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Politechnica University Timisoara, 300500 Timisoara, Romania
Constantin Florescu: Department of Hydrotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Politechnica University Timisoara, 300500 Timisoara, Romania
Relu Adam: Department of Hydrotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Politechnica University Timisoara, 300500 Timisoara, Romania
Albert Titus Constantin: Department of Hydrotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Politechnica University Timisoara, 300500 Timisoara, Romania
Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 23, 1-19
Abstract:
Flood protection infrastructures are crucial for enhancing the resilience of societies exposed to natural hazards. Newly designed infrastructures are evaluated for sustainability using a coherent and internationally recognized method defined by the International Hydropower Association (IHA). However, in operation, old structures require a different assessment approach. Different work proposes a modified IHA protocol, mHSAP, which identifies opportunities for improvement and develops a sustainability evaluation framework for existing infrastructures. This paper applies the modified protocol to evaluate the sustainability of two types of flood protection structures: a unique canal system for flood–drought protection of an urban area and a flood protection dike. The time of operation of these structures is over 250 years and over 50 years, respectively. The application of the modified framework demonstrates its advantages in identifying areas for improving flood protection structure operation while maintaining the structure’s sustainability. It also illustrates how Romanian water boards can use such tools to facilitate collaboration between structure owners and stakeholders, allowing them to assess the risks and effects of flooding on society. Through these two examples from Romania, we also show that the mHSAP framework has the potential to actively support the fulfillment of the United Nations Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The results presented here show that this method can be further utilized by water board authorities to account for climate change effects, address related challenges in a coordinated and efficient manner, develop resilient flood management strategies, inform infrastructure investment decisions, and enhance collaboration among water management authorities.
Keywords: water resources engineering; mHSAP protocol; flood risk; improved water management; sustainable infrastructure; Romania (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10573/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10573/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10573-:d:1535261
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().