Analyzing the Role of Polycentric Governance in Institutional Innovations: Insights from Urban Climate Governance in India

Anita Yadav, Naqui Anwer, Krushna Mahapatra, Manish Kumar Shrivastava and Dilip Khatiwada ()
Additional contact information
Anita Yadav: Department of Sustainable Engineering, TERI School of Advanced Studies, Plot No. 10 Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi 110 070, India
Naqui Anwer: Department of Sustainable Engineering, TERI School of Advanced Studies, Plot No. 10 Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi 110 070, India
Krushna Mahapatra: Department of Built Environment and Energy Technology, Linnaeus University, 351 95 Växjö, Sweden
Manish Kumar Shrivastava: Earth Science and Climate Change Division, The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), Darbari Seth Block, India Habitat Centre, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003, India
Dilip Khatiwada: Division of Energy Systems, Department of Energy Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Brinellvägen 68, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 23, 1-21

Abstract: In the face of climate change, urban governance systems must adapt to uncertainties and emerging pressures. Polycentric governance, characterized by multiple decision-making centers at different scales, enables coordination across levels and provides flexibility, which allows for experimentation and context-specific action, catalyzing institutional innovations in cities. These innovations involve creating new structures and modifying existing ones to help cities better withstand and adapt to the impacts of climate change. There are plenty of studies on this issue in developed country context, but such studies in the context of developing countries are lacking, especially in India. This article aims to explore the influence of polycentric governance on institutional innovations, thereby offering insights on how it contributes to transformative urban governance in India, characterized by (1) stewarding capacity, (2) unlocking capacity, (3) transformative capacity, and (4) orchestrating capacity. The research findings suggest that polycentric governance increases diversity and autonomy in decision-making centers across levels, which can enable more innovation or flexibility, leading to improving governance capacity to respond to changing circumstances, but these developments are still in nascent stage and further research is needed to assess the long-term sustainability of these capacities. The findings not only contribute to governance research and provide insights for policymaking, but also contribute to the broader discourse on urban resilience and sustainable development aligning with SDG 11 (sustainable cities and communities) and SDG 17 (partnerships for the goals) globally, especially in the Global South.

Keywords: climate policy; urban climate governance; polycentricism; urban resilience; institutional innovation; governance capacity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10736/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10736/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10736-:d:1538561

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().