The Return of Coal-Fired Combined Heat and Power Plants: Feasibility and Environmental Assessment in the Case of Conversion to Another Fuel or Modernizing an Exhaust System

Stanislav Chicherin (), Andrey Zhuikov and Petr Kuznetsov
Additional contact information
Stanislav Chicherin: Thermo and Fluid Dynamics (FLOW), Faculty of Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium
Andrey Zhuikov: Educational and Scientific Laboratory, Siberian Federal University, Svobodny Ave., 79., Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russia
Petr Kuznetsov: Educational and Scientific Laboratory, Siberian Federal University, Svobodny Ave., 79., Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russia

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 5, 1-15

Abstract: Large city-scale coal-fired combined heat and power (CHP) plants are one of the main contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. The motivation is to find a way to decrease the contributions in the most feasible way possible. The importance of this study is that it presents a methodology for comparing scenarios from both environmental and economic points of view. The scenarios aim to enhance the environmental performance of combustion flue gas-treatment units. The scenarios include installing an advanced electrostatic precipitator (ESP), a hybrid system comprising ESP and a bag filter, a combined cyclone and baghouse filter, a hybrid baghouse filter with novel electrostatic tissue, a wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) scrubber, a WFGD with (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 technology, and fuel conversion (incl. biomass). Each of the scenarios is evaluated according to (a) primary energy consumption, (b) capital (CapEx) and operational (OpEx) costs, and (c) the obtained environmental effect (decreasing emissions of particulate matter (PM), CO 2 , SO 2 , and NO x ). Adopting biomass waste decreases CO 2 emissions by 50%. PM from the coal-fired boiler with particle filtration is lower compared to biomass but is two times higher than that from natural gas. Using advanced filters for a CHP plant decreases total emissions and PM by 2100–2800%. The largest effect on air quality is achieved by filtration and WFGD, with emissions decreasing by 43%. Primary energy consumption is maximal in fuel conversion and ESP scenarios. The conversion to limestone-based WFGD or the installation of a hybrid filter separately are the most viable options, totaling EUR 14.2 billion of CapEx. However, combining several technologies is essential to increase the quality of flue gas treatment.

Keywords: boiler; emission; burning; volumetric rate; greenhouse gases; GHG (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1974/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1974/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1974-:d:1347306

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().