Trade-Offs and Synergies of Key Biobased Value Chains and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Víctor Fernández Ocamica (), Bárbara Palacino, Carmen Bartolomé, Monique Bernardes Figueirêdo and Cristina Lázaro García
Additional contact information
Víctor Fernández Ocamica: Research Centre for Energy Resources and Consumption CIRCE, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
Bárbara Palacino: Research Centre for Energy Resources and Consumption CIRCE, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
Carmen Bartolomé: Research Centre for Energy Resources and Consumption CIRCE, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
Monique Bernardes Figueirêdo: Research Centre for Energy Resources and Consumption CIRCE, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
Cristina Lázaro García: Colegio Compañía de María, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 7, 1-36

Abstract: This work identifies relevant sustainability targets from the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for main value chains of biobased products, categorized into four dimensions: environment, circularity, social, and economics. Of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 85 targets were identified as aligning with sustainability criteria for industrial biobased systems. Six sectors with biobased activity were analyzed, chemicals, construction, plastics, textiles, woodworking, and pulp and paper, each represented by 3–5 value chains. These value chains were chosen based on certification availability, production scale in Europe, economic importance, and potential to replace fossil-based products. In total, 25 value chains were assessed qualitatively for their positive, negative, or neutral impact on each selected SDG target, using public data like EU reports, life cycle analyses, and expert insights. The results showed that 43 SDG targets were directly applicable to the value chains, with higher synergies for those using waste as feedstock over primary resources like crops or virgin wood. Overall, advances in technology and holistic approaches are paving the way for biobased solutions to replace resource-intensive, petroleum-derived materials and chemicals. These alternatives offer additional advantages, such as enhanced recyclability, biodegradability, and reduced toxicity, making them promising candidates for sustainable development. This study underscores that technological progress and a comprehensive approach can further advance sustainable biobased solutions in industry and have a relevant positive impact on various SDGs.

Keywords: sustainability; biobased products; circularity; SDGs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3040/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3040/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3040-:d:1623460

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().