Bringing the “Missing Pillar” into Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Intersubjective Values-Based Indicators

Gemma Burford, Elona Hoover, Ismael Velasco, Svatava Janoušková, Alicia Jimenez, Georgia Piggot, Dimity Podger and Marie K. Harder
Additional contact information
Gemma Burford: Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Elona Hoover: Sustainable Development Coordination Unit, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Road, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK
Ismael Velasco: Sustainable Development Coordination Unit, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Road, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK
Svatava Janoušková: Charles University Environment Center, José Martího 2/407, 16200 Prague 6, Czech Republic
Alicia Jimenez: Earth Charter Initiative, c/o University for Peace, San Jose 138 6100, Costa Rica
Georgia Piggot: Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
Dimity Podger: Barasa Consulting Group, 131 Croydon Avenue, Croydon Park NSW 2133, Australia
Marie K. Harder: Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China

Sustainability, 2013, vol. 5, issue 7, 1-25

Abstract: This paper argues that the need for a core “fourth pillar” of sustainability/sustainable development, as demanded in multiple arenas, can no longer be ignored on the grounds of intangibility. Different approaches to this vital but missing pillar (cultural-aesthetic, religious-spiritual, and political-institutional) find common ground in the area of ethical values. While values and aspects based on them are widely assumed to be intangible and immeasurable, we illustrate that it is possible to operationalize them in terms of measurable indicators when they are intersubjectively conceptualized within clearly defined practical contexts. The processes require contextual localization of items, which can nonetheless fit into a generalizable framework. This allows useful measurements to be made, and removes barriers to studying, tracking, comparing, evaluating and correlating values-related dimensions of sustainability. It is advocated that those involved in operationalizing sustainability (especially in the context of creating post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals), should explore the potential for developing indicators to capture some of its less tangible aspects, especially those concerned with ethical values.

Keywords: Sustainable Development Goals; Post 2015 Development Agenda; Millennium Development Goals; sustainability; governance; values; ethical framework; indicators; intersubjectivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/7/3035/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/7/3035/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:5:y:2013:i:7:p:3035-3059:d:27171

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().