A Simplified Method for Evaluating Building Sustainability in the Early Design Phase for Architects

Jernej Markelj, Manja Kitek Kuzman, Petra Grošelj and Martina Zbašnik-Senegačnik
Additional contact information
Jernej Markelj: Faculty of Architecture, University of Ljubljana, Zoisova cesta 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Manja Kitek Kuzman: Department of Wood Science and Technology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Rožna Dolina, cesta VIII 34, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Petra Grošelj: Department of Wood Science and Technology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Rožna Dolina, cesta VIII 34, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Martina Zbašnik-Senegačnik: Faculty of Architecture, University of Ljubljana, Zoisova cesta 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Sustainability, 2014, vol. 6, issue 12, 1-21

Abstract: With society turning increasingly to sustainable development, sharper demands are being made concerning energy efficiency and other properties that mean reductions in the negative effects of the building on the environment and people. This means that architects must have a suitably adapted solution already in the early design phase, as this has the greatest influence on the final result. Current tools and methods used for this are either focused only on individual topics or are too complex and not adapted for independent use by architects. The paper presents a simplified method for evaluating building sustainability (SMEBS) which addresses these needs. It is intended as a tool to aid architects in the early project planning phases as it allows a quick evaluation of the extent to which the demands of sustainable building are fulfilled. The method was developed on the basis of a study of international building sustainability assessment methods (BSAM) and standards in this field. Experts in sustainable construction were invited to determine weights for assessment parameters using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Their judgments reflect the specific characteristics of the local environment.

Keywords: building; architect; sustainability; evaluation; analytic hierarchy process (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/12/8775/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/12/8775/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:12:p:8775-8795:d:43008

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().