EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Wineries’ Perception of Sustainability Costs and Benefits: An Exploratory Study in California

Eugenio Pomarici, Riccardo Vecchio and Angela Mariani
Additional contact information
Eugenio Pomarici: Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padua, Legnaro 35020, Italy
Riccardo Vecchio: Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici 80055, Italy
Angela Mariani: Department of Economic and Legal Studies, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Naples 80133, Italy

Sustainability, 2015, vol. 7, issue 12, 1-11

Abstract: The present study aims to make a contribution to the analysis of costs and benefits of adopting sustainable practices. The paper reports the results of an exploratory study into wineries’ perceived mix of economic costs and benefits and environmental benefits provided by participating in the Certified California Sustainable Winegrowing scheme. A total of 14 wineries, representing more than 50% of the entire wine production of California certified wine (and 25% of all certified wineries), participated in the study. Based on the information detected through face-to-face semi-structured interviews with winery managers and owners, performing a descriptive analysis and a logit model, we reveal that overall economic benefits, resulting from the sustainable practices introduced by the certification scheme, outweigh the additional costs. In particular, older wineries (>15 years) and those located in Sonoma Valley or onmultiple sites are more keen to assign a positive economic viability tosustainable practices. Furthermore, sustainable vineyard practices are highly rated by respondents in terms of both perceived environmental and economic benefits. Outcomes should foster similar studies exploring other specific sustainability programs and certification schemes, and eventually encourage cross-cultural investigations.

Keywords: wine industry; sustainable practices; Certified California Sustainable Winegrowing scheme; economic costs and benefits (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/12/15806/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/12/15806/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:12:p:15806-16174:d:59962

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:12:p:15806-16174:d:59962