Assessing the Communication Quality of CSR Reports. A Case Study on Four Spanish Food Companies

Amparo Baviera-Puig, Tomás Gómez-Navarro, Mónica García-Melón and Gabriel García-Martínez
Additional contact information
Amparo Baviera-Puig: Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain
Tomás Gómez-Navarro: Energy Engineering Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain
Mónica García-Melón: INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain
Gabriel García-Martínez: Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain

Sustainability, 2015, vol. 7, issue 8, 1-22

Abstract: Sustainability reports are tools for disseminating information to stakeholders and the public, serving the organizations in the dual purpose of communicating CSR and being accountable. The production of these reports has recently become more prevalent in the food industry, despite the fact this practice has received heavy criticism on two fronts: The quality of the tool for communication, and the extent of accountability. In addition to these criticisms, organizations must overcome the additional challenge of publishing sustainability reports that successfully meet the demands of a multi-stakeholder audience. In light of the importance of this practice, this paper presents a method to assess the communication and accountability characteristics of Spanish food companies’ sustainability reports. This method is based on the method Analytic Network Process (ANP) and adopts a multi-stakeholder approach. This research, therefore, provides a reference model for improving sustainability reports, with the aim of successfully meeting their communication objectives and the demands of all stakeholders.

Keywords: CSR; sustainability reports; multi-stakeholder; ANP; MCDM; GRI (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/8/11010/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/8/11010/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:8:p:11010-11031:d:54078

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().