A Three-Dimensional Sustainability Evaluation of Jatropha Plantations in Yucatan, Mexico
Julio C. Sacramento Rivero,
Amarella Eastmond-Spencer,
Javier Becerril García and
Freddy S. Navarro-Pineda
Additional contact information
Julio C. Sacramento Rivero: Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Periferico Norte km 33.5, Tablaje Catastral 13615, Col. Chuburna de Hidalgo Inn, Merida, Yucatan 97203, Mexico
Amarella Eastmond-Spencer: Social Sciences Unit, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Calle 61 x 66 No. 525, Centro, Merida, Yucatan 97000, Mexico
Javier Becerril García: Faculty of Economics, Km. 1 Carretera Mérida-Tizimín, Cholul, Merida, Yucatan 97305, Mexico
Freddy S. Navarro-Pineda: Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Periferico Norte km 33.5, Tablaje Catastral 13615, Col. Chuburna de Hidalgo Inn, Merida, Yucatan 97203, Mexico
Sustainability, 2016, vol. 8, issue 12, 1-18
Abstract:
This paper presents a unique sustainability analysis of one of the first attempts to establish a biodiesel industry in Mexico. From 2008, several companies established medium to large-sized Jatropha curcas plantations in Yucatan, hiring local peasants to carry out the agricultural work. After five years, the plantations were abandoned due to poor seed yields and a lack of key knowledge for large-scale cultivation. Based on a multidisciplinary approach, we performed a three-dimensional sustainability evaluation of the potential biodiesel production chain, which included household interviews, a socioeconomic survey, and a life-cycle assessment (LCA). We identified both negative and positive effects in the three dimensions analyzed. Socially and culturally, the local peasant families understood sustainability as their ability to preserve their traditional lifestyle, and associated environmental services with their sense of identity. They therefore considered the jatropha plantations to be positive for sustainability, since they brought income, even though some perceived damage to the natural resources of the surrounding areas. Economically, peasants’ annual household income increased by approximately $1080 USD due to the increased salaries paid by the jatropha companies. The LCA predicted large savings of greenhouse gas emissions (>50% compared to fossil diesel), but also potential negative impacts in some categories (human/ecological toxicity and eutrophication potentials) associated with the use of mineral fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides applied during the cultivation stage. Biodiesel production would be potentially energetically self-sufficient, in addition to producing a 40% energy surplus. Finally, even though the sustainability indicators suggested a positive overall assessment, the reality was that the jatropha projects failed because they were predicated on unrealistically optimistic projections and poor agronomic knowledge of the plant.
Keywords: sustainability perception; propensity score matching; life-cycle assessment; biofuels; biodiesel (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/12/1316/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/12/1316/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:12:p:1316-:d:85100
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().