Are Local Food Chains More Sustainable than Global Food Chains? Considerations for Assessment

Gianluca Brunori, Francesca Galli, Dominique Barjolle (), Rudolf Van Broekhuizen, Luca Colombo, Mario Giampietro, James Kirwan, Tim Lang, Erik Mathijs, Damian Maye, Kees De Roest, Carin Rougoor, Jana Schwarz, Emilia Schmitt, Julie Smith, Zaklina Stojanovic, Talis Tisenkopfs and Jean-Marc Touzard
Additional contact information
Gianluca Brunori: Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
Francesca Galli: Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
Rudolf Van Broekhuizen: Rural Sociology Group, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
Luca Colombo: Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca in Agricoltura Biologica e Biodinamica, 00153 Roma, Italy
Mario Giampietro: Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Spain
James Kirwan: Countryside and Community Research Institute, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham GL50 2RH, UK
Tim Lang: Centre for Food Policy, City University, London EC1V 0HB, UK
Damian Maye: Spain and Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
Kees De Roest: Centro Ricerche Produzioni Animali S.p.A.—C.R.P.A. S.p.A., 42121 Reggio Emilia, Italy
Carin Rougoor: Centre for Agriculture and Environment Foundation (CLM), 4104 BA Culemborg, The Netherlands
Jana Schwarz: Division of Bioeconomics, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Emilia Schmitt: Sustainable Agroecosystems Group, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich ETH, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Julie Smith: Centre for Food Policy, City University, London EC1V 0HB, UK
Zaklina Stojanovic: Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
Talis Tisenkopfs: Baltic Studies Centre, LV1014 Riga, Latvia
Jean-Marc Touzard: Inra, UMR Innovation, 34060 Montpellier, France

Sustainability, 2016, vol. 8, issue 5, 1-27

Abstract: This paper summarizes the main findings of the GLAMUR project which starts with an apparently simple question: is “local” more sustainable than “global”? Sustainability assessment is framed within a post-normal science perspective, advocating the integration of public deliberation and scientific research. The assessment spans 39 local, intermediate and global supply chain case studies across different commodities and countries. Assessment criteria cover environmental, economic, social, health and ethical sustainability dimensions. A closer view of the food system demonstrates a highly dynamic local–global continuum where actors, while adapting to a changing environment, establish multiple relations and animate several chain configurations. The evidence suggests caution when comparing “local” and “global” chains, especially when using the outcomes of the comparison in decision-making. Supply chains are analytical constructs that necessarily—and arbitrarily—are confined by system boundaries, isolating a set of elements from an interconnected whole. Even consolidated approaches, such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), assess only a part of sustainability attributes, and the interpretation may be controversial. Many sustainability attributes are not yet measurable and “hard” methodologies need to be complemented by “soft” methodologies which are at least able to identify critical issues and trade-offs. Aware of these limitations, our research shows that comparing local and global chains, with the necessary caution, can help overcome a priori positions that so far have characterized the debate between “localists” and “globalists”. At firm level, comparison between “local” and “global” chains could be useful to identify best practices, benchmarks, critical points, and errors to avoid. As sustainability is not a status to achieve, but a never-ending process, comparison and deliberation can be the basis of a “reflexive governance” of food chains.

Keywords: local; global; food supply chain; sustainability; assessment; reflexive governance; post-normal science (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (61)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/5/449/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/5/449/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:5:p:449-:d:69582

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().