EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Simulation and Assessment of Whole Life-Cycle Carbon Emission Flows from Different Residential Structures

Rikun Wen, Shenjun Qi and Ahmad Jrade
Additional contact information
Rikun Wen: College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forest University, Hangzhou 311300, China
Shenjun Qi: College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China
Ahmad Jrade: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada

Sustainability, 2016, vol. 8, issue 8, 1-15

Abstract: To explore the differences in carbon emissions over the whole life-cycle of different building structures, the published calculated carbon emissions from residential buildings in China and abroad were normalized. Embodied carbon emission flows, operations stage carbon emission flows, demolition and reclamation stage carbon emission flows and total life-cycle carbon emission flows from concrete, steel, and wood structures were obtained. This study is based on the theory of the social cost of carbon, with an adequately demonstrated social cost of carbon and social discount rate. Taking into consideration both static and dynamic situations and using a social discount rate of 3.5%, the total life-cycle carbon emission flows, absolute carbon emission and building carbon costs were calculated and assessed. The results indicated that concrete structures had the highest embodied carbon emission flows and negative carbon emission flows in the waste and reclamation stage. Wood structures that started the life-cycle with stored carbon had the lowest carbon emission flows in the operations stage and relatively high negative carbon emission flows in the reclamation stage. Wood structures present the smallest carbon footprints for residential buildings.

Keywords: carbon emission flow; structure; residence; simulation; total carbon emission flow; absolute carbon emission; building cost of carbon (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/8/807/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/8/807/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:8:p:807-:d:76063

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:8:p:807-:d:76063