A Parameter Selection Framework for Sustainability Assessment

Eleni Iacovidou, Jonathan Busch, John N. Hahladakis, Helen Baxter, Kok Siew Ng and Ben M. J. Herbert
Additional contact information
Eleni Iacovidou: School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Jonathan Busch: School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
John N. Hahladakis: School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Helen Baxter: School of Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
Kok Siew Ng: Centre for Environment and Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
Ben M. J. Herbert: Stopford Energy & Environment, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK

Sustainability, 2017, vol. 9, issue 9, 1-18

Abstract: Sustainability assessment of resource recovery from waste is an important prerequisite for informed and sound decision-making. Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) has been developed to support this process, yet its use is still constrained by the difficulty of identifying the most relevant impact parameters. This paper, seeks to inform LCSA for resource recovery from waste based on a parameter identification approach that uses the political , economic , social , technological , environmental and legal (PESTEL) analysis. The novelty of this approach lies in the structured conceptualisation of the resource recovery system and the context within which decisions are made. The anaerobic digestion of source-separated food waste in the UK is used as a case study to trial and demonstrate the approach. Findings suggest that a conceptual, qualitative analysis, although limited in its scope due to the lack of quantitative components, is suitable in integrating different parameters, allowing for a holistic conceptualisation of the system and capturing important issues that could be easily overlooked. This type of analysis can summarise the key interdependencies, contrast the trade-offs and provide a wider understanding of the political and legal context within which the system operates, all important in extending the implementation of LCSA towards the right direction.

Keywords: sustainability assessment; anaerobic digestion; PESTEL; resource recovery; food waste; LCSA (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1497/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1497/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:9:p:1497-:d:109363

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().