The Porter Hypothesis Goes to China: Spatial Development, Environmental Regulation and Productivity
Pedro Naso and
Timothy Swanson
No 53-2017, CIES Research Paper series from Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute
Abstract:
We examine the relationship between environmental regulation and competitiveness in China. Exploiting exogenous changes in national pollution standards for three industries—ammonia, paper and cement—we test whether environmental regulation increases industry productivity. Our results show that the strong version of the Porter hypothesis does not hold, but that regulation might reallocate productivity spatially. We show that regulated industries that are located in newly developing cities see an increase in their productivity as compared to the same industries in other cities. This means that environmental regulation is more likely to drive the spatial distribution of productivity changes than it is to drive the pace and direction of technological change.
Keywords: Tax competition; Production Technology and Environment and Development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D24 H71 O13 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 46 pages
Date: 2017-10-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cna, nep-eff, nep-ene, nep-env, nep-tra and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://repec.graduateinstitute.ch/pdfs/ciesrp/CIES_RP_53.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gii:ciesrp:cies_rp_53
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CIES Research Paper series from Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kristine Kjeldsen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).